jo: (outlander)
[personal profile] jo posting in [community profile] outlander_forum
*** WARNING! This thread is for discussing deviations between episode 302 and the source material, the novel Voyager. If you have not read the book, please understand that the discussion will contain possible spoilers for the series moving forward (including possibly beyond the current season). However, if you have no intention of reading the book, or don't mind spoilers, or are simply curious to know how things differed, proceed at your own risk! ***

If you wish to discuss episode 302, please do so on the dedicated episode discussion thread.

There were a few notable changes from the source material in this episode. How do you think these will affect the story going forward? Did you like the changes? Did any annoy or upset you?

Date: 2017-09-18 12:40 pm (UTC)
suzy: (Default)
From: [personal profile] suzy
As you know now, I haven't read the book but if I am to speculate anyway... I assume in the book we see Caveman Jamie more streched out over those 6 years. Aka, Fergus visits Jamie now and again. Here we jumped straight into 6 years later. So they had to tell that story in a shorter time narrative. I am not sure how much longer an added cask would have done but the redcoats were side eyeing Fergus in the show so maybe they thought having them following him made more sense than having them randomly intercept him? Still don't explain the cask.... but maybe they simply don't plan the story so far ahead? We only know book 4 is a sure thing right?

Yes, to me Mary would have come out of left field if she hadn't been prominent in the episode. This way, I got a nice feel for her. And it made her part of the family, that she loved and was protective of them.

I kept wondering where Jenny's daughter was. Maggie was it? She wasn't dead was she?

Date: 2017-09-18 01:50 pm (UTC)
suzy: (Default)
From: [personal profile] suzy
Yeah. I did find it odd that they would just cut off his hand like that and then just abandon him.

Date: 2017-09-21 03:30 pm (UTC)
anoyo: Columbus & Tallahassee shopping, text "Rule #32 Enjoy the little things" (zland enjoy)
From: [personal profile] anoyo
The bit with Fergus bugged me a little, since it's part of Fergus getting to be "historical," and I adore that, but I suppose it still accomplished the same thing? Except that if we ever make it to season I-don't-remember-which-Heart's-Blood-is, that little thing won't be there. Which, my god, we can hope we make it there!

Date: 2017-09-21 06:46 pm (UTC)
anoyo: Neal B&W looking up. (wc neal possibilities)
From: [personal profile] anoyo
100% Maybe quicker than explaining that it became a part of the Dunbonnet lore? That's the only thing I can think of in its favor.

Date: 2017-09-21 11:51 pm (UTC)
anoyo: Ianto "know everything" quote. (torchwood ianto know everything)
From: [personal profile] anoyo
To reply to both comments: Most of Roger's realizations are great. He's so smart, and yet so shortsighted sometimes.

As for Murtagh, I hope he's really only back for flashbacks. His literary purpose as Jamie's logical foil (logical when Jamie isn't, illogical when Jamie is, same with violence and romance) is really moot, with Jamie growing up as much as he does in "Voyager."

Also: I love Duncan, please let's keep him. (And Jocaste. Forever. I adore them.)

Profile

outlander_forum: (Default)
For Fans of the Outlander Books and Show

2025

S M T W T F S

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2025 10:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »